Harmonization of Values Sumbang Marriage with Islamic Marriage Law
An Integrative Study of Conflict and Socio-Legal Reconstruction in Kerinci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v9i1.34148Keywords:
Sumbang Marriage, Islamic Law, Customary Marriage, Legal HarmonizationAbstract
The relationship between customary law and Islamic law within the Kerinci indigenous community of Jambi reflects a dynamic and evolving socio-legal interaction shaped by historical, cultural, and religious influences. These two normative systems coexist within the same social framework and frequently intersect in regulating various aspects of community life, particularly in the domain of marriage. In many instances, the interaction between these systems demonstrates harmony and mutual reinforcement; however, certain practices reveal underlying tensions that necessitate adaptive negotiation. One notable example is the practice of Sumbang Marriage, which refers to unions between individuals with close blood relations. Within customary law, such marriages are not strictly prohibited but are subject to social sanctions in the form of fines (budendo). In contrast, Islamic law establishes clear prohibitions regarding specific degrees of kinship, thereby creating a complex legal landscape for the community. This study employs a qualitative research method based on library research, drawing on academic literature, customary legal documents, and relevant statutory regulations. A descriptive-analytical approach is utilized to interpret legal texts alongside socio-cultural contexts in order to identify patterns of interaction, points of conflict, and mechanisms of harmonization between customary and Islamic legal systems. The findings indicate that the Kerinci community does not perceive customary law and Islamic law as mutually exclusive. Instead, it develops adaptive mechanisms to integrate both systems. Customary practices are often reinterpreted or modified to align with Islamic principles, while areas of tension are addressed through deliberative processes involving customary leaders and religious authorities. This integrative approach reflects a pragmatic model of legal pluralism, in which negotiation and contextual interpretation play central roles. Ultimately, the coexistence of these legal systems is continuously reshaped through social practice, resulting in a context-sensitive and adaptive legal order.
References
Journals and Books
Ayman Shabana. Customs in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ’Urf and Adah in Islamic Legal Tradition. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law and History, 2010.
Azhar. “Islamic Law Reform in Indonesia from the Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī’ah: Kerinci’s Intellectual Views.” Samarah 8, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.15051.
Beckmann, Franz von Benda Beckmann, and Keebet von Benda. “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Legal Pluralisme and Unofficial Law 47 (2002).
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 34, no. 47 (2002): 37–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, and Keebet von Benda-Beckman. “Transnationalisation of Law, Globalisation and Legal Pluralism: A Legal Anthropological Perspective.” In Hukum Yang Bergerak: Tinjauan Antropologi Hukum, edited by Sulistyowati Irianto, 1–28. Jakarta: Obor, 2009.
Bowen’s, John R. Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Bowen, John R. Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. New York: Melbourne Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Dafizki, Ashlih Muhammad, Edi Rosman, and Busyro Busyro. “Tradisi Budendo Pelaku Nikah Sumbang Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Islam.” USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v1i2.7530.
Dafizki, Ashlih Muhammad, Edi Rosman, and Kecamatan Air Hangat. “Tradisi Budendo.” Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 2 (2023): 140–47.
Ehrlich, Eugen. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1936.
Engel, David M., and M. B. Hooker. “Adat Law in Modern Indonesia.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 28, no. 2 (1980).
Fauzan, Abdul Qodir Zaelani, M. Harir Muzakki, Imam Syafi’i, and Bustomi. “Endogamous Marriage of Prophet’s Descendants on the Perspective of Sociology of Islamic Law.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 18, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.7132.
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Gover, Kirsty. “Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Legal Traditions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.7.
Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 57 (2013): 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.
Habi, Nuraida Fitri, Robi’Atul Adawiyah, Hermanto Harun, Ardian Kurniawan, and Rusli Abdul Roni. “Prioritizing Restorative Justice in the Settlement of the Sumbang Besak Adultery Case in Babeko Village, Jambi.” El-Mashlahah 14, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v14i2.8030.
Hidayati, Rahmi, Ramlah, Illy Yanti, Haris Mubarak, and Dian Mukhlisa. “Flexibility of Women’s Inheritance Distribution in Jambi Malay Society: Compromising Islamic and Customary Law.” El-Usrah 7, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.22038.
Iskandar, Nuzul. “Hukum Islam Jurnal Islamic and Cultural Negotiations in Endogamous Marriage in Kerinci,” 1829.
Jambi, Dataran Tinggi. “Lanskap Budaya Masyarakat Kerinci Di Pusat Wilayah Adat Tanah Sekudung, Dataran Tinggi Jambi Hafiful Hadi S, Dr. Anggraeni, M.A.” 2 (2018).
Jufrizal, Jufrizal. “The Role of Niniak Mamak in the Prevention of Early Marriage through the Harmonization of Adat Basandi Syara’.” Jurnal AL-AHKAM 15, no. 2 (2025).
Lev, Daniel S., and M.B. Hooker. “Adat Law in Modern Indonesia.” Pacific Affairs 53, no. 1 (1980).
Lukito, Ratno. “The Enigma of National Law in Indonesia: The Supreme Court’s Decisions on Gender-Neutral Inheritance.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 38, no. 52 (2006).
Lukito, Ratno, and Marsya Salsabilla Az-Zahra. “Codification of Islamic Law in Comparative Perspective: Between Tradition and Modernity.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2026).
Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism Author (s) Sally Engle Merry Published by : Wiley on Behalf of the Law and Society Association Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/3053638.” Journal of Law and Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988).
Puspita, Mega. “Kawin Sumbong: Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Perkawinan Adat Kerinci Jambi.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, n.d.
Reinhardt, Thomas. “Geertz, Clifford: The Interpretation of Cultures.” In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_11651-1.
Rodgers, Susan. “Kinship, Property, and Inheritance in Kerinci, Central Sumatra. By C. W. Watson. Canterbury: Center for Social Anthropology and Computing, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1992. Distributed by Cellar Book Shop. Viii, 252 Pp. $25.00 (Paper).” The Journal of Asian Studies 54, no. 2 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2058842.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. “Law: A Map of Misreading: Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.” Journal of Law & Society 14 (n.d.): 279–302.
Solin, Siti Dian Natasya, Mursyid Djawas, Aulil Amri, Andi Sugirman, and Asni Zubair. “Batak Customary Marriage: A Study of the Prohibition of Same-Clan Marriage and Its Relevance in the Contemporary Era.” El-Usrah 7, no. 1 (2024).
Sumardi, Dedy, Ratno Lukito, and Moch Nur Ichwan. “Legal Pluralism within the Space of Sharia: Interlegality of Criminal Law Traditions in Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah 5, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9303.
Tasman, M. Hukum Perkawinan Adat Kerinci Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Hukum Perkawinan Adat Kerinci dalam Perspektif Islam, 2014.
Watson, C. W. “Local Lineages in Kerinci, Sumatra.” Indonesia and the Malay World 48, no. 142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2020.1801030.
Wimra, Zelfeni. “Reintegrasi Konsep Maqashid Syari’ah Dalam Adat Basandi Syara’, Syara’ Basandi Kitabullah.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 15, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v15i2.499.
Interviews
Interview with Datuk H. M. Yusuf Gelar Depati Rajo, Customary Leader in Air Hangat District, Kerinci, 12 February 2026.
Interview with Drs. H. Syafrizal, Religious Leader in Siulak District, Kerinci, February 14, 2026.
Interview with KH. Ahmad Ridwan, S.Ag., Religious Leader in Gunung Kerinci District, February 15, 2026.
Interview with AR (initials), Practitioner of Sumbang Marriage in Kerinci Regency, 21 February 2026.
Interview with NL (initials), Practitioner of Sumbang Marriage in Kerinci Regency, 21 February 2026.
Interview with M. Fikri, Marriage Registrar at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) of East Air Hangat District, February 17, 2026.
Interview with Nurhayati, Community Member in Danau Kerinci District, 19 February 2026.
Interview with Junaidi, Community Member in Koto Tengah Village, Kerinci, 18 February 2026.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-05-30 (2)
- 2026-05-30 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Halil Khusairi, Asa’ari Asa’ari, Faizin Faizin, and Iqbal Katrino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
